| Pages: [1] |
1. Show us your Avatar - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tisiphone Dira wrote: Wouldn't be a most beautiful avatar thread with tisiphone Twisty neck deathly looking chicks are just win !
- by Spectre 666 - at 2015.09.21 22:33:04
|
2. Let's talk about Capitals and Supercapitals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
modes is just a code word for T3 without raising the notable (justified?) ire surrounding T3 ships in general. Lets just use the term T3 so we can carry on this discussion 'above board' so to speak.
- by Spectre 666 - at 2015.07.17 02:59:14
|
3. A new module, Signatur deployer (enhancer) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Going down on the side that effectively trashing the scanning system will not be good for the game. -1
- by Spectre 666 - at 2015.07.17 00:24:19
|
4. Stop shuffling the character portraits in the login screen! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
would also prefer the remain positionally stable. +1
- by Spectre 666 - at 2015.07.17 00:16:31
|
5. Would it be sensible if...... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kiddoomer wrote: I really had to look 3 times at your avatar to realise that you're a giraffe suffering from macrocephaly (it burned my eyes in the process though). For the topic the bonus is fine as it is now, but maybe a little separation...
- by Spectre 666 - at 2015.07.17 00:14:01
|
6. Accessible Fleet Battles for Everybody - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Harry Forever wrote: Lan Wang wrote: next you will be asking if we can make up the fleet numbers with programmed npc's actually thats not a bad idea, you could hire the npc with ISK, maybe 10m for one frigate 50m for a cruiser.. with th...
- by Spectre 666 - at 2015.07.16 23:24:40
|
7. Would it be sensible if...... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Iain Cariaba wrote: elitatwo wrote: Spectre 666 wrote: Xe'Cara'eos wrote: mission time bonuses were moved from a fixed X isk if you complete in Y time to something along the lines of A bonus isk for every second under B time sorry I c...
- by Spectre 666 - at 2015.07.16 22:32:18
|
8. Would it be sensible if...... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Frostys Virpio wrote: elitatwo wrote: Spectre 666 wrote: Xe'Cara'eos wrote: mission time bonuses were moved from a fixed X isk if you complete in Y time to something along the lines of A bonus isk for every second under B time sorry I...
- by Spectre 666 - at 2015.07.16 22:27:51
|
9. Dreadnought and Titan Secondary Weapon Rack for Point Defence - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
For the most part this game is, sadly, based on most attack ships having just one offensive weapon type at a time and making titans a notable exception would be horrible.
- by Spectre 666 - at 2015.07.16 17:58:18
|
10. Accessible Fleet Battles for Everybody - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
i think this is a good idea but if you are not using coms you are going to get eaten even if you outnumber your opponents 10 to 1. That being said i know form playing wow that people learn who they should and should not group with and the idea wo...
- by Spectre 666 - at 2015.07.16 17:53:09
|
11. Would it be sensible if...... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Xe'Cara'eos wrote: mission time bonuses were moved from a fixed X isk if you complete in Y time to something along the lines of A bonus isk for every second under B time sorry I can't make wonderful pretty graphs with the standard keyboard! ...
- by Spectre 666 - at 2015.07.16 17:46:10
|
12. [Rebalance] The Wrecks - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
annoying other players is God (EVE) given right that should be cherished and protected, so no to your idea.
- by Spectre 666 - at 2015.07.14 22:34:36
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |